文章以中美国际OA期刊为例，结合OA期刊的传统引文指标并引入Altmetrics指标，构建中美国际OA期刊影响力评价与比较模型，从OA期刊的学术影响力、社会影响力两个维度构建OA期刊评价指标体系。通过标准化处理、相关分析、信/效度分析、因子分析、二维分析等对中美国际OA期刊学术影响力与社会影响力进行评价与比较。研究发现：（1）不论是在学术影响力层面，还是在社会影响力层面，中美国际OA期刊评价得分值相差甚大，美国国际OA期刊的影响力远大于中国国际OA期刊的影响力。（2）基于JCR的7个传统引文指标间呈现较强的正相关，基于Altmetrics Explorer的8个Altmetrics 指标间呈现高度的正相关关系，且指标在整体上与内部间都具有较为显著的一致性。（3）66种中美国际OA期刊的学术影响力得分与社会影响力得分存在中度的正相关关系，OA期刊学术影响力评价为社会影响力评价做了有益补充。最后提出提升我国国际OA期刊影响力的建议。

Taking the international OA(Open Access) journals of China and USA as an example and combining traditional citation indexes and introducing the Altmetrics indexes, this paper constructs a model of impact evaluation and comparison and constructs an evaluation index system of OA journals from two dimensions of academic influence and social influence. Through standardization, correlation analysis, reliability/validity analysis, factor analysis and two-dimensional analysis, the academic and social influence of OA journals are evaluated and compared between China and
USA. The authors found that:（1）In terms of academic influence and social influence, the evaluation scores of international OA journals are quite different between China and USA. The influence of American international OA journals is far greater than that of Chinese international OA journals.（2）There is a strong positive correlation between the 7 traditional citation indicators based on JCR, and a high positive correlation between the 8 Altmetrics indexes based on Altmetrics explorer, and the indexes have a significant consistency both overall and internally.（3）There is a moderately positive correlation between academic influence and social influence scores of 66 OA journals. The evaluation of academic influence of OA journals is a useful supplement to the evaluation of social influence. Finally, suggestions are put forward to enhance the influence of Chinese international OA journals.