专题研究

学术“全评价”体系与中国特色哲学社会科学学术评价体系的构建与完善

展开
  • (南京大学信息管理学院 江苏 210023
叶继元,男,1955年生,南京大学信息管理学院教授,博士生导师。

网络出版日期: 2021-05-12

The Construction and Improvement of the Academic All-round Evaluation System and the Academic Evaluation System of Philosophy and Social Sciences with Chinese Characteristics

Expand
  • School of Information Management, Nanjing UniversityJiangsu210023

Online published: 2021-05-12

摘要

[目的/意义]构建中国特色哲学社会科学学术评价体系是一个科学的问题,需要运用科学的研究方法和恰当的路径来研究。应采用概念分析法、案例分析法、比较分析法、抽象思维法、信息法、系统法等多种研究方法,沿着厘清问题、调查现状、提出体系框架、论证检验、推广运用的路径,来构建中国特色哲学社会科学评价体系。[过程/方法“] 中国特色”的本质特征是导向性、民族性、原创性和学理性,与“国际性”并非截然对立而应相辅相成。11年前构建的学术“全评价”体系由六大要素、三个维度、八项推论等构成,以唯物史观的价值论为指导,强调学术共同体和实践、历史在价值判断中的独特地位,能够合理解释目前评价中存在的问题及其原因,科学提出解决方案。[结果/结论]该体系的研究过程、成果及其影响是构建中国特色哲学社会科学评价体系的一次系统探索,在研究方法和路径等方面提供了宝贵的经验,值得进一步推广应用,不断完善。

本文引用格式

叶继元 .

学术“全评价”体系与中国特色哲学社会科学学术评价体系的构建与完善

[J]. 情报资料工作, 2021 , 42(3) : 15 -22 . DOI: 10.12154/j.qbzlgz.2021.03.002

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] It is a scientific problem to construct the evaluation system for philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, which needs to use scientific research methods and appropriate path to study. Various research methods such as conceptual analysis, case analysis, comparative analysis, abstract thinking, information, and system methods should be adopted, and so on to construct the evaluation system of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics along the path of clarifying the problems, investigating the current situation, proposing the system framework, demonstrating and testing, and promoting the application.[Method/process] The essential characteristics of "Chinese characteristics" are orientation, nationality, originality and academic rationality, which are not diametrically opposed to "internationality" but should complement each other. The academic "full evaluation" system constructed 11 years ago is composed of six elements, three dimensions, and eight inferences. It is guided by the value theory of historical materialism and emphasizes the uniqueness of academic publicity community and practice, and history in value judgments. Status can reasonably explain the existing problems and their causes in the current evaluation, and scientifically propose solutions. [Result/conclusion] The research process, results and impact of this system are a systematic exploration of the construction of a philosophy and social science evaluation system with Chinese characteristics. It provides valuable experience in research methods and paths, and is worthy of further promotion and application and continuous improvement.

文章导航

/