[目的/意义]哲学社会科学学术评价牵涉面广，涉及主体众多，厘清不同主体的评价职责与责任边界是建立中国特色哲学社会科学学术评价体系的前提要件。[方法/过程]基于文献调查法、比较分析法，通过哲学社会科学学术评价发展演进过程的历史考察，揭示学术评价体系与学术体系、管理体系之间的内在关联关系，归纳学术共同体和行政管理部门等主体的评价职责。[结果/结论]研究发现，学术评价既脱胎于哲学社会科学学术研究又服务于现代哲学社会科学学术发展与学术事务管理，既需要多主体的科学分工、准确定位、密切协作，也需要明确不同主体的准入边界、准入方式与职责内容、权利义务。当前，要明确新时代中国特色哲学社会科学学术评价的使命承载，直面评价管理中的问题症结，明晰多主体评价关系与职责边界，进而建构基于学术信任的学术共同体自律与多主体评价监督相结合的阳光评价体系与健康评价生态。

[Purpose/significance] Academic evaluation of philosophy and social sciences involves many fields and subjects. Clarifying the evaluation responsibility and responsibility boundary of different subjects is a prerequisite for establishing an academic evaluation system of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics.[Method/process] Based on the literature survey and comparative analysis method, through the historical investigation of the development and evolution of academic evaluation in philosophy and social sciences, the internal correlation between academic evaluation system, academic system and management system is revealed, and the evaluation responsibilities of academic community and administrative departments are summarized.[Result/conclusion] It is found that the academic evaluation is based on academic research and its service in the modern philosophy and social sciences academic development and academic affairs management. It is not only necessary to carry out scientific division of labor and accurate positioning among multi subjects, but also need to clarify the responsibility boundary of each subject, including the rights, ways,responsibilities and obligations. At present, the main task is to clarify the mission of academic evaluation of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics in the new era, facing the crux of problems, defining the

relationship and responsibility boundary of multi-subject evaluation, then construct a sunshine evaluation system and healthy evaluation ecology that combines academic community self-discipline based on academic trust and multi-subject supervision.