[目的/意义]论文旨在比较国内外图书情报与档案管理学界的研究热点，探索学术热点与学科发展的关 系。[方法/过程]论文采用计量方法考察2019—2021年间CSSCI、SSCI所反映的国内外图书情报与档案管理学科 学术热点，比较其与“中国图情档学界十大学术热点”的异同，分析学术热点与学科发展之间的协同关系。[结果/ 结论]研究发现，国内外学界普遍关注疫情引发的健康信息问题、社交媒体中的用户行为、文献计量、图书馆管理、 数据治理等问题；中国图情档学界与业界更关注学术命题与国家重大战略的连结，更加重视履行学科历史使命； 学术热点推动学科发展的进程，学科建设的成果也反映在学术热点的进化中。

 [Purpose/significance] The purpose of this paper is to compare the research hotspots in the field of library, information and archives management at home and abroad, and to explore the relationship between academic hotspots and development of the discipline.[Method/process] The paper employs the quantitative method to investigate the academic hotspots of library, information and archives management at home and abroad reflected by CSSCI and SSCI from 2019 to 2021, and compares them with the“Top Ten Academic Hotspots in China’s LIA Management”organized by the Book and Newspaper Information Center of Renmin University of China,and explores the synergistic relationship be? tween academic hotspots and disciplinary development.[Result/conclusion] The study reveals that domestic and for? eign academics are commonly concerned about health information issues caused by the epidemic, user behavior in social media, bibliometrics, library management, and data governance. The academics and professionals in China pay more attention to the connection between academic propositions and major national strategies. The academic hotspots promote the process of discipline development, and the advances and achievements of discipline construction are also reflected in the evolution of academic hotspots.