[目的/意义]完善当前学科文献资源保障评价体系的目标能够为国家“双一流”建设、中国自主的知识体 系构建和文献保障能力现代化提供有力支撑，通过综述我国面向学科建设的文献资源保障评价研究成果，为促进 相关理论研究与实践发展提供参考。[方法/过程]在分析文献资源保障评价对学科建设重要性的基础上，从宏观 和微观两个层面对评价尺度、评价视角、评价对象、评价指标和评价方法进行归纳梳理，并针对当前研究进展提出 未来可行的发展方向。[结果/结论]当前我国围绕高校图书馆文献资源保障评价主题进行了广泛研究，并随图书 馆文献资源形式与服务模式的变化不断深入与细化，但针对不同院校与不同学科建设要求的文献资源保障特性 展开的评价研究尚处于起步阶段，仍需从细化评价尺度、融合评价视角、拓展评价对象、优化评价指标和更新评价 方法等方面提升面向学科建设的文献资源保障评价研究水平。

[Purpose/significance] The goal of improving the current guaranteeevaluation system of literature resourc? es in disciplines can provide strong support for the national "double first-class" construction,the construction of Chi? na's independent knowledge system and modernization of literature guarantee ability, and by reviewing the research re? sults of literature resource guarantee evaluation for discipline construction in China, it can provide reference for promot? ing the development ofrelevant theoretical research and practice.[Method/process] On the basis of analyzing the im? portance of literature resource guarantee evaluation to discipline construction, the current research progress is sorted out from the macro and micro aspects of evaluation scale, evaluation perspective, evaluation object, evaluation index and evaluation method, and the future feasible development directions are proposed for the current research.[Result/ conclusion] At present, China has conducted extensive research on the topic of literature resource guarantee evalua? tion of university libraries, and it has been deepened and refined with the changes in the form and service mode of li? brary literature resources, but the evaluation research on the characteristics of literature resource guarantee for differ? ent institutions and different discipline construction requirements is still in the initial stage, and it is still necessary to improve the research level of literature resource guarantee evaluation for discipline construction in terms of refining the evaluation scale, integrating the evaluation perspective, expanding the evaluation objects, optimizing the evaluation in? dexes and updating the evaluation methods.