理论探讨

智慧图书馆生成式人工智能应用场景及其法律问题

  • 徐 芳
展开
  • 1 苏州大学中国特色城镇化研究中心 江苏 215123; 

    2 苏州大学社会学院 江苏 215123; 

    3 苏州城市学院城市治理与公共事务学院 江苏 215104

徐 芳,男,1980年生,苏州大学社会学院教授,博士生导师。

网络出版日期: 2024-03-13

基金资助

本文系苏州大学新型城镇化与社会治理协同创新中心研究项目、2022年苏州大学人文社会科学青年交叉研究团队项目“大数据管理与应用 研究”(项目编号:202205)和苏州城市学院国家级预研项目“基于关联数据的大运河线性文化遗产数字记忆构建研究”(项目编号: 2021SGY003)的阶段性成果。

Application Scenarios and Legal Issues of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Smart Libraries

  • Xu Fang
Expand
  • 1 Centre for Chinese Urbanization Studies of Soochow University, Jiangsu, 215123; 

    2 School of Social Science of Soochow University, Jiangsu, 215123; 

    3 School of Urban Governance and Public Affairs, Suzhou City University, Jiangsu, 215104

Online published: 2024-03-13

摘要

[目的/意义]生成式人工智能在智慧图书馆服务中应用具有较大的潜力和优势,能促进智慧图书馆提供 更高效智能的服务。但是,人工智能生成内容法律地位和责任归属的不明确等所带来的法律问题也不容忽视。 [方法/过程]文章回顾了生成式人工智能与AIGC的概念;分析了生成式人工智能在智慧图书馆中的虚拟咨询、学 科知识服务、中小微企业专题推送、阅读推广以及信息素养教育与培训等主要应用场景;讨论了生成式人工智能 在智慧图书馆主要服务场景中AIGC的准确性引发的责任、用户隐私权、著作权归属与相关规则失效以及算法歧 视等法律问题及应对之策。[结果/结论]深入剖析这些法律问题背后的内在逻辑,从法学理论层面寻求系统的解 决方案,需要在后续研究中进一步探索。

本文引用格式

徐 芳 . 智慧图书馆生成式人工智能应用场景及其法律问题[J]. 情报资料工作, 2024 , 45(2) : 24 -29 . DOI: 10.12154/j.qbzlgz.2024.02.003

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The application of generative artificial intelligence in smart library services has great potential and advantages, which can provide more efficient and intelligent services for smart library. However, since the legal status and responsibility of AIGC is not clear, the ensuing legal problems cannot be ignored. [Method/ process] This paper reviews the concepts of generative artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence-generated con⁃ tent. Then, it analyzes the main application scenarios of generative AI in smart library, including virtual consulting ser⁃ vice, subject knowledge service, micro, small and medium-sized enterprises thematic push service, reading promotion service and information literacy education and training service. Finally, it discusses the liability issues arising from AIGC accuracy, user privacy, copyright ownership and invalidation of relevant rules and algorithmic discrimination of AIGC in the main service scenario of intelligent library, and puts forward countermeasures. [Result/conclusion] The in-depth analysis of the internal logic behind these legal problems and the search for systematic solutions from the lev⁃ el of legal theory need to be further explored in the follow-up research.
文章导航

/