[目的/意义]以ChatGPT为代表的生成式人工智能技术能够参与知识生产、创造数据价值，这有益于推动知识生产主体的多元化，增强产出成果的个性化、多样化，推动数据信息的流通、共享，实现生产结构的协同化。对这一过程中的实践机理与法治机制的探讨具有必要性，能够为该过程的有效实施提供足够的制度保障。[方法/过程]论证ChatGPT参与知识生产的法治机制的前提在于明确其可能带来的问题隐患，ChatGPT参与知识生产可能弱化人类作为主体的创造性、自主性，消解相关内容的真实性、影响数据基本价值，破坏原有知识生产环境的同时干扰人类对知识传播秩序的有效把控，甚至危害主流意识形态的主导地位。[结果/结论]需要建立ChatGPT参与知识生产的体系性法治机制，在遵循价值理性原则的基础上，建立法律规范体系，完善全过程行政监管与司法救济手段，形成社会各主体共同参与的协同治理格局。

[Purpose/significance] Generative artificial intelligence technologies represented by ChatGPT can partici⁃pate in knowledge production and data value creation, which is beneficial for promoting the diversification of knowl⁃edge production entities, enhancing the personalization and diversity of output,facilitating the circulation and sharing of data information, and achieving the collaboration of production structures. The discussion related to the practical mechanism and the legal mechanism in this process will be necessary, which can provide the sufficient institutional guarantee for the effective implementation of this process. [Method/process] The premise of arguing ChatGPT partici⁃pating in knowledge production and legal mechanism lies in the clarification of problems and hidden dangers caused by it, the involvement of ChatGPT in knowledge production may weaken the creativity and autonomy of humans as the main creators, undermine the authenticity of relevant contents, impact the basic value of data, disrupt the existing knowledge production environment, and interfere with effective human control over the effective order of knowledge dis⁃semination, even pose a threat to the dominant position of mainstream ideologies. [Result/conclusion] In this regard,there is a need to establish a systematic legal mechanism for ChatGPT's participation in knowledge production,estab⁃lish the legal regulatory system based on the compliance of principles of the value rationality, improve the full process administrative supervision and judicial remedies, and form the collaborative governance pattern that all social entities participate commonly.