[目的/意义]摒弃“以刊评文”、淡化量化指标、推行代表作评价制度，以优化学术资源配置，快速扭转原创、突破、颠覆性成果明显偏少的局面。主观性强、创新非共识、同行利益纠结使得同行评议难以胜任代表作评价制度，当务之急是变革评价方法，落实代表作评价制度。[方法/过程]作者提出开放评价法15年，不断完善并提出其简明版“互联网+代表作”评价法，继承同行评议的优点并克服其缺陷，通过评价公开规范展示的代表作以实现评价的客观公正与高效合理。[结果/结论]开放评价及其简明版实现学术评价的客观化，不仅可以有效落实代表作评价制度，破解“一流人才”僵局，而且引发开放教育革命，实现教育机构之间的公平竞争，充分激活开放教育资源，加快“双一流”建设。

[Purpose/significance] To optimize the allocation of academic resources and effectively change the situation that original, breakthrough and overturning achievements are comparatively less in number, the methodology of scoring academic articles according to the journals they are published on should be abandoned, the quantitative indicators should be given less emphasis and the evaluation system of representative works should be adopted. The shortcomings such as strong subjectivity, differentiation of views on innovation as well as interest entanglement of peers render peer review incompetent. It is urgent to change present evaluation methodology and implement the evaluation system of representative works. [Method/process] Proposed the theory of open evaluation 15 years ago, the author has kept improving it and proposed its concise version,“Internet+representative works”evaluation. This method, taking the advantages of peer review while overcoming its disadvantages, realizes the fairness, justice, effectiveness and rationality of evaluation by assessing representative works which are openly and formally presented.[Result/conclusion] Open evaluation and its concise version make academic review objective. They could not only enable the effective function of the evaluation system of representative works and break the deadlock over first-class talents, but also trigger open education revolution, realizing fair competition among educational institutions, promoting the openness of educational resources and accelerating the Double First-class construction.