理论探讨

基于中医治未病理论的信息疫情 治理困境及纾困方略研究 ——以新冠肺炎信息疫情为例

  • 胡 峰
展开
  • 江苏省科学技术发展战略研究院;江苏省科学技术情报研究所 
胡 峰,男,1982年生,江苏省科学技术发展战略研究院、江苏省科学技术情报研究所副研究员。

网络出版日期: 2022-11-11

Research on the Dilemma of Information Epidemic Control and Relief Strategies Based on the TCM Theory of Preventive Treatment of Disease: Taking the Information Epidemic of COVID-19 as an Example

  • Hu Feng
Expand
  • Jiangsu Academy of Science and Technology for Development;Jiangsu Information Institute of Science and Technology

Online published: 2022-11-11

摘要

[目的/意义]信息疫情系统风险及其衍生危害需要寻求合理有效的治理方略,这既是构建大安全格局的 应然要求,也是表征风险治理能力的实然体现。[方法/过程]在阐释中医治未病理论运用于信息疫情治理逻辑适 恰性的基础上,以全球新冠肺炎信息疫情治理现实为例,基于“病灶点”锚定的逻辑,解构了信息疫情治理在治未 病四阶段存在的困境,并提出信息疫情治理的纾困方略。[结果/结论]在“健康无病态”“欲病未发态”“既病未传 态”“病后未固态”的四阶段,新冠肺炎信息疫情治理分别存在“信息防疫意识的普遍缺位”“风险监测预警的线性 滞后”“政府强力干预的公民缺场”“边际收益递减的注意弱化”四大困境。针对前述困境,从“固化正气”“审辨阴 阳”“整体施治”“纠正偏颇”四大维度提出了治理对策。

本文引用格式

胡 峰 . 基于中医治未病理论的信息疫情 治理困境及纾困方略研究 ——以新冠肺炎信息疫情为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2022 , 43(6) : 38 -47 . DOI: 10.12154/j.qbzlgz.2022.06.005

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] It is necessary to seek a reasonable and effective governance strategy for informa? tion epidemic system risks and derived hazards, which is not only a necessary requirement for building a large security pattern, but also an actual manifestation of the ability of risk governance. [Method/process] On the basis of explaining the appropriateness logic of the theory of TCM treatment of pre- disease applied to the information epidemic gover? nance, taking the reality of global COVID-19 information epidemic governance as an example, based on the logic an? chored by the "focal point", this paper deconstructs the prominent predicaments of information epidemic governance in the four stages of disease treatment, and on this basis, constructs strategies for information epidemic governance. [Re? sult/conclusion] In the four stages of healthy without disease, wanting to be sick, not being sick and not solid after ill? ness, there are four governance predicaments, namely general lack of awareness of information epidemic prevention; lin? ear lag in risk monitoring and early warning; absence of citizens with strong government intervention, and weakening at? tention with diminishing marginal returns. In response to the aforementioned predicaments, governance strategies are put forward from the four dimensions, namely solidifying righteousness, distinguishing yin and yang, overall governance and correcting bias.
文章导航

/