[目的/意义]探索公共数字文化服务供给效率影响因素并据此提出驱动路径，旨在加快推进公共文化服
务数字化建设的研究进展。[方法/过程]基于TOE分析框架，结合我国公共数字文化服务供给特点与实践，提出理
解公共数字文化服务供给效率差异的整合性分析框架，并运用模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA）方法对我国31个省
（自治区、直辖市）公共数字文化服务供给效率进行组态分析。[结果/结论]研究发现：（1）任意单一条件并不构成
公共数字文化服务供给效率差异的必要条件。（2）技术设施建设、注意力分配、财政分权、公民外部需求和府际竞
争是影响公共数字文化服务供给效率提升的前因变量，并在此基础上生成了组织型、环境型、组织-环境型和技
术-组织-环境型四种影响公共数字文化服务供给效率提升的组态模式。（3）公共数字文化服务供给效率的技术、
组织、环境条件组态存在着5种潜在替代关系以“殊途同归”的方式提升公共数字文化服务供给效率。
[Purpose/significance] This paper explores the influencing factors of the supply efficiency of public digital
cultural services, and puts forward the driving path, in order to accelerate the research progress of the digital construc?
tion of public cultural services. [Method/process] Based on the toe analysis framework, combined with the supply
characteristics and practice of public digital cultural services in China, this paper puts forward an integrated analysis
framework to understand the differences in the supply efficiency of public digital cultural services. Using the method of
fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsqca), this paper analyzes the supply efficiency of public digital cultural ser?
vices in 31 provinces (urban areas) in China. [Result/conclusion] The study found that: (1) Any single condition does
not constitute a necessary condition for the difference in the supply efficiency of public digital cultural services.
(2) Technological facilities construction, attention distribution, fiscal decentralization, citizens' external demand and
intergovernmental competition are the antecedent variables affecting the improvement of the supply efficiency of public
digital cultural services. On this basis, four configuration modes affecting the improvement of the supply efficiency of
public digital cultural services are generated, including organization type, environment type, organization environment
type and technology organization environment type. (3) Considering the differences in technological, organizational and
environmental conditions, there are five potential alternative relationships among the combinations of conditions for the
supply efficiency of public digital cultural services, so as to improve the supply efficiency of public digital cultural ser?
vices by "reaching the same goal by different ways".
