[目的/意义]推进公共文化服务适老化建设对于提升老年人的文化获得感和幸福感、构建中国式积极老龄化社会具有重要意义，而系统探究当前我国公共文化服务适老化建设政策特点，明晰政策工具的结构与问题，可为未来政策优化提供参考。[方法/过程]从政策工具视角出发，构建“政策工具—老年人需求—政策执行者”三维分析框架，采用内容分析法对我国66份政策文本进行量化分析。[结果/结论]在政策工具维度，供给型政策工具偏重于教育培训，环境型政策工具约束力不足，需求型政策工具运用明显不足；政策工具对中低层次老年人需
求的关注度有待强化；政策工具未充分发挥政策执行者职能。据此提出如下优化策略：（1）调整供给型政策子类工具布局以支撑教育培训发展；强化环境型政策工具，软硬结合打造适老环境；丰富需求型政策工具，吸引多主体常态化参与；（2）遵循由低至高的逻辑满足老年人需求；（3）推动政策执行者多元化以充分发挥社会力量。

[Purpose/significance] Promoting the construction of elderly-friendly public cultural services is of great significance for enhancing the cultural sense of achievement and happiness of the elderly, and building a Chinese style active aging society. Systematically exploring the characteristics of current policies for elderly-friendly public cultural services in China, clarifying the structure and problems of policy tools, can provide reference for future policy optimiza⁃tion. [Method/process] This study constructs a three-dimensional analysis framework of“policy tools - elderly needspolicy implementers”from the perspective of policy tools, and uses content analysis to quantitatively analyze 66 policytexts released in China. [Result/conclusion] In terms of policy tools, supply oriented policy tools tend to focus on edu⁃cation and training, environmental policy tools have insufficient binding force, and the use of demand oriented policy tools is significantly insufficient. The attention of policy tools to the middle and low-level needs of elderly people should be strengthened. Policy tools have not fully utilized the functions of policy implementers. Based on this, the fol⁃lowing optimization strategies are proposed: (1)adjusting the layout of supply oriented policy subclasses to support the development of education and training; strengthening environmental policy tools and combining soft and hard measures⁃to create an elderly-friendly environment; enriching demand driven policy tools to attract multiple stakeholders to par⁃ticipate on a regular basis；(2)following the logic of low to high to meet the needs of the elderly；(3)promoting the diver⁃sification of policy implementers to fully leverage social forces.