[目的/意义]个人信息保护实践应结合具体场景特点与需求。分析我国法律政策中个人信息内涵、价值 评估方式、监管机制，发现以上三者未考虑场景因素，导致个人信息内涵界定模糊、价值评估单一、监管机制粗放 等情况。[方法/过程]纵观国际有关场景化的个人信息保护法律政策文本及保护机制，发现美国、日本倾向制定专 类法律，英国与欧盟侧重建立监管机制。[结果/结论]借鉴国际有关个人信息保护场景化方面的经验，结合我国现 实情况，提出“相对+绝对”个人信息内涵界定、“主观+客观”评估信息价值、“统一+具体”个人信息监管机制等 建议。

[Purpose/significance] The practice of personal information protection should be combined with specific scenario characteristics and needs. Analyzing the connotation of personal information, the way of value assessment, and the regulatory mechanism in Chinese legal policies, it is found that the above three do not take into account the scenario factors, resulting in vague definition of the connotation of personal information, single value assessment, and rough regu? latory mechanism. [Method/process] Looking at international legal policy texts and protection mechanisms for scenar? io-based personal information protection, the paper found that the United States and Japan tend to formulate specific laws, while the United Kingdom and the European Union focus on establishing regulatory mechanisms. [Result/conclu? sion] Drawing on the international experience of personal information protection scenarios and taking into account the real situation in China, the paper proposed a "relative + absolute" definition of personal information, a "subjective + ob? jective" assessment of information value, and a "unified + specific" personal information regulation and a "uniform + specific" personal information regulatory mechanism.