Wang Xu, Dai Chunyan, Liu Pengrui
[Purpose/significance] With the vigorous development of the open science movement, uncovering its enhancement effect on the international academic discourse power of Chinese papers and conducting a multi-perspective evaluation of such discourse power holds practical significance for facilitating the efficient dissemination of Chinese papers within the open science system and enhancing their international academic discourse power. [Method/process]This paper employs Chinese management papers as the sample. It constructs an evaluation index system that encompasses four key dimensions: academic originality, academic influence, academic communication power, and academic leadership power, by integrating scientometric indicators, altmetrics, and full-text bibliometric indicators. Simultaneously, the study utilizes propensity score matching to assess the enhancement effect of the open science environment on the international academic discourse power of Chinese papers. This study adopts the propensity score matching method to evaluate the promotion effect of the open science environment on the international academic discourse power of Chinese papers. It further applies the CRITIC-BP and CRITIC-TOPSIS methods to assess such discourse power from single-dimensional and comprehensive perspectives under the open science environment, and finally conducts intelligent verification of the evaluation results via CNN. [Result/conclusion] The open science environment exerts distinct promotive effects on four key dimensions of Chinese papers. Specifically, the enhancing impacts on academic recognition level, international dissemination effectiveness, and disciplinary leadership are 11.4, 2.19, and 0.1, respectively. Significant correlations are identified both among the various dimensions of the international academic discourse power of Chinese papers and between each dimension and the comprehensive evaluation result. International academic discourse power in Q1 journal papers tends to be highly concentrated. For Chinese scholars' participation in international collaborative Q1 journal papers, supportive involvement is the main form, and their leading role remains relatively limited.